🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Trend

Across Europe, a growing group of states are considering comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "an tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors unless parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a good starting point," said the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful social media material contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from the West, further states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this global discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and its followers indicate that states around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.